Endowment for The Future of the South

Fall 2003 Issue
* Director’s Column
* Jimmy Thomas 
*You Can't Eat Magnolias
* Call for Papers
* Natchez Literary Celebration
*SST Courses-Fall 2003
*Southern Photographs
* Amy Evans
* Bercaw Joins SST Faculty
* Ventress Order
* Leighton Lewis
* Ron & Becky Feder
* Altobellis, Advancement Associate
* Delta & Welty Programs
* OCB 2004
* Glisson Heads Winter Institute
* Welty Portrait Given to University
* Janisse Ray
* Reading the South
* Intolerable Burden
* Brown Bay Schedule-Spring 2004
* SFA-A Fabulous Field Trip to Asheville
* SFA-Lamb Barbeqcue
* SFA-Book Review
* F&Y Report
* Living Blues
* Thacker Mountain Radio
* Herring's Second CD Debuts
* Strawberry Plains Oral History Project
* Strawberry Plains Collection Donated
* Walter Anderson Exhibition
* Ethridge - Sun, Fun, and Research
* Regional Roundup
* Notes on Contributors


Back to Register Home

     
 


Excerpts from the essay collection You Can’t Eat Magnolias (1972), edited by H. Brandt Ayers and
Thomas H. Naylor.



“ Southerners–Jefferson, Madison, John Marshall–conceived the design of our democracy and found the words to describe it, words we still quote. Up to the time of Lincoln’s inauguration the South had dominated the White House, the Congress, the Supreme Court, the cabinet, even American diplomacy. The Jeffersonian tradition encouraged a vigorous and respectable school of antislavery in the South which exposed and attacked the evils of slavery on every level. The slave states contained many more antislavery societies than the free states, furnishing leadership for the Abolitionist movement. But even while a Tennessean, Andrew Jackson, was spreading the participatory power of democracy to average citizens everywhere, the South was beginning to be locked into the paradox from which it is just now showing signs of escaping.”
H. Brandt Ayers
“You Can’t Eat Magnolias”


“Increasingly, a large number of Southerners have a strong desire to seek realistic solutions to the South’s problems. Among these Southerners are the moderate governors recently elected in half a dozen Southern states, and the members of the L.Q.C. Lamar Society, whose goals are constructive change through practical solutions to the South’s major problems. These individuals (and many others like them) recognize the South’s great potential in terms of both human and natural resources. That the South still has a chance to avoid some of the urban and environmental problems of the North is well understood by this new breed. . . .

People like these are committed to the premise that Southerners can find practical solutions to such problems as poverty, low per capita income, inadequate schools and housing, inferior health and sanitary conditions, and an excessive rate of populations growth. If there is to be a ‘Southern Strategy,’ it should be and will be designed by Southerners for the benefit of all the people of the South and not merely feed the old retarding mythology which has sustained visions of the past by starving the imagination of government and people alike.”
Thomas H. Naylor
“ A Southern Strategy”


 

Archive    |    Subscribe   |    Center for the Study of Southern Culture