|
1
|
- Meinhard Doelle
- Dalhousie University Law School
- Marine and Environmental Law Program
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Canadian Context
- Climate Change Impacts In Canada
- Sources of Emissions In Canada
- Opportunities for Emission Reductions
- Federal/Provincial Relations
- Canada’s Position/Role Internationally
- Sinks
- Kyoto Mechanisms
- Compliance
- Long Term Issues (Dev Countries, US, Beyond 2012)
- Implementing Kyoto in Canada
- Conclusion
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Temperature
- Precipitation
- Habitat
- Arctic Ice
- Water Temperature
- Coasts under Threat
- Extreme Weather Events
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Examples:
- Caribou
- Polar Bears
- Sea birds
- Grey Jays
- Whales
- Coral
- Marsupials
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Contributing Gases:
- CO2 (~ 75%)
- CH4 (~ 15%)
- NOx (~ 8%)
- A # of other gases with minor but growing contributions
- Sources by Human Activity
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- Use Less Energy
- Efficiency & Conservation
- Fuel Switching
- Fossil Fuels to Renewables
- Non-energy sources
- Methane from agriculture etc
- Offsets
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Supply Not Sustainable - Once all fossil fuels are burned, then nothing
left for future generations
- Security of Supply - 1973 Arab oil embargo
- Damage to Habitat
- Coal: Tailings, Strip Mines, Acid Mine Drainage
- Oil: tanker spills, tank
leakage, pipeline corridors
- Natural Gas: sour gas wells, pipeline corridors
- Reduce Consumption of Other Resources
- Save Money
- Economic Benefits from New Industries
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Biomass 3-7 million km2 short rotation tree crops
- Methanol 8-19 million km2 of trees
- Ethanol 5 million km2 of arable land (sugar cane)
- (US cropland is about 1.56 million km2)
- Solar-Hydrogen 448,000 km2
of land for photovoltaics
- Wind 1.3 million km2 of land, 403 million turbines (500
kW capacity ea., 3 per ha.)
- Hydro-electricity 3.1 million km2 of land
- Source: 1998: Lightfoot,
H.Douglas and Chris Green: New Sources of Energy are Needed To Halt
- Global Warming in Policy Options (May) p. 17
|
|
25
|
- 1. Use Less Energy (~ 60 - 70%)
- 2. Renewables (~ 20 - 40%)
- 3. Cleaner Fossil Fuels (Transition)
- 4. Efficient Fossil Fuels (Transition)
- 5. Non-Energy GHG (Small)
- 6. Sinks (Temporary)
|
|
26
|
- Very Different Costs and Benefits
- National Energy Policy
- Pre-Kyoto Fed/Prov Negotiations
- Fed/Prov Since 1997
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- Very Different Costs and Benefits
- Net Energy Producer or Consumer
- Source of Electricity
- Change since 1990
- Plans for Future Economic Development
- National Energy Policy
- Pre-Kyoto Fed/Prov Negotiations
- Fed/Prov Since 1997
|
|
29
|
- General
- Sinks
- Mechanisms
- Compliance
- Long Term Issues, Beyond 2012
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
- The Federal Implementation Plan
- The Context!
- Kyoto or long term? (-6 or –
80%)
- Domestic or Kyoto Mechanisms?
- Users or Taxpayers?
- Sinks, permanence and competing land use
- Electricity Sector
- Energy Exports
- Large Industrial Emitters
- Transportation
- Buildings
- The Citizen
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- Future Prospects
- Canada’s Role Internationally
- Canada’s Challenges Domestically
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|