Campus Management Status Report ~ 12-12-2001

Overview

The last two weeks have been marked by much activity. Highlights are noted here. See individual team reports (Academic Structure, Student Administration, Student Accounting, Reporting, Web / Interfaces, Organizational Readiness, Technology Infrastructure) for additional detail.

Burkhard worked with SAP representatives to document the results of the meetings held between SAP, Sigma, UM and CMU the week of 11/26. The outcome is a table that lists each issue, gives descriptive information and specifies action items and assignments. In some cases SAP and/or Sigma will further enhance the existing interfaces, and in others universities will create software customizations or will implement process changes to achieve the desired result. See the Student Accouting Report below for related activities.

On Tuesday, 12/11, Burkhard, Fant, Ferguson, Gates, Garner, Hale, Miller, Stocks, Stribling, and Thurlow participated in a video-conference call with Karin Busch and Joachim Plumbaum to discuss the CM development plan. Generally, we are pleased with the progress that CM developers are making on meeting their objectives. The progress made over the last six months is particularly impressive. We still have some concerns about whether we have the necessary functionality to "go live" on our campus. Of particular concern is the ability to migrate student academic history data from the legacy system to CM. Busch recognized this need as well and intends to follow up after the CM develop team conducts its next strategy meeting in late January or early February. Burkhard, Stribling, and Thurlow have prepared notes documenting the call and the subsequent responses from Plumbaum. We appreciate the responsiveness by Busch and Plumbaum to our concerns and questions. Thurlow and Burkhard are also to be commended for their careful and thorough review of the development plan documents.

One of the first applications to be rolled out is the academic structure, including the web presentation. Success in this area relies on deciding on an appropriate academic structure, inputting course catalog data and creating the web interfaces. We are identifying resources to help with data entry from 1/22/2003-2/1/2003. Stocks, Stribling and Thurlow are finalizing the academic structure prototype. Ferguson is developing XSLT programs to tranform XML-formatted academic structure data to HTML and JSP. He is using the remote function calls that are provided with Campus Management to pull the data.

Harrington is chairing a committee to hire an additional IT FTE to work on Campus Management. Current SIS technical staff are making good progress in becoming familiar with functional aspects of Campus Management. A successful project requires that we approach the task of developing general technical skills, e.g., ABAP, XML, Java, with diligence and assertiveness. As expected, maintaining the legacy system while implementing CM is proving to be a challenge and requires resourcefulness on the part of both managers and technical staff.

Several weeks ago, Stribling developed a document titled, "CAMPUS MANAGEMENT Transport Standards" (see http://www.olemiss.edu/projects/first/cm/docs/transport.pdf). This has been approved. Gates is in the process of placing the 70+ items that have been identified in the issues spreadsheet in the issues database developed by Ferguson so that progress can be tracked and resolutions can be documented. Representatives from Information Builders, Inc. were here this week to install the latest version of Focus/WebFocus. Focus/WebFocus is used now to provide end-users with views on SIS data and may play a role in meeting CM reporting needs.


Academic Structure


Student Administration


Student Accounting

Student Accounting Status Report For the Period: 11/12/2001 - 12/09/2001

Reporting


Web / Interfaces


Organizational Readiness


Technology Infrastructure